Anybody who cares to review the non-fiction literature
on sexual relationships of the past few years, or even
the past few decades, especially the literature from
different parts of the world, or just the literature
from social environments that are different from one's
own social environment, arrives at a simple
conclusion: Most of what is written, simply is wrong.
Some sources are just outdated, and they give the feel
of being outdated already through the antiquated
English that is used. But it doesn't stop there. Even
contemporary sources, and even scientific sources
usually do not reflect what each of us has learned on
some very essential sexual questions.
What do women want? What do men want? What are the
best sexual strategies? What should I be, how should I
present myself, what can I do to have optimal sexual
opportunities (or, land the best gal or the best guy).
Why do so many sources that we may consult get things
so wrong?
The point is simply: there is so much variety among
different social environments, that whatever the rules
for successful mating might be in one environment,
chances are they won't apply to another one. And the
more pluralistic today's societies become, the greater
the difference between the "styles" that are rewarded
by the best sexual opportunities.
But while there are differences, there are also
similarities. It's just that one has to define to
which environment different rules apply.
Southeast Asian societies, by and large, are not as
pluralistic as European societies. But in between
Asian societies, the differences are much more
pronounced than in between European societies. This is
not just the case for such macro-cultural aspects such
as language, script, religion, and form of
governments.
The modes of sexual conduct also vary greatly, and
with it, the settings in which Western men will best
score sexually.
I have lived in Southeast Asia for several years, I have
traveled to, and researched for sexual opportunities, all
except Brunei.
In every Southeast Asian country, I have friends who
have chosen their particular country because they are
convinced that for sexual relationships, the country
they have chosen is best.
But they are just optimally adapted to one country.
And the modes that work best in Thailand are
completely wrong for Indonesia, and if you want to
find in China what you have in Cambodia, you will be
very disappointed.
The differences among the countries in Southeast Asia
are fundamental. But you can have satisfying sexual
relationships in each of them. Provided you know what
to look for, and provided you don't look for the wrong
thing in the wrong country.
Adapting to a specific country can take many months.
When those who have previously adapted to one Asian
country move to another one, they will invariably try
the same patterns that worked so well in the previous
country...and fail miserably. Unless they have proper
guidance.
The "sexual opportunities" member section does provide
such guidance. And in addition to articles that
provide proper insight, members are encouraged to
communicate with me directly by email. The information
people are looking for often is very particular.
Some people try to find answers by searching on the
Internet. The short-coming of this approach is that
many people who publish their hints on the web know
just one country. There is, to the best of my
knowledge, no other website apart from mine, that
would compare Southeast Asian countries among each
other for their prospects of sexual exploits.